Sales Of Goods Act Educational Comparison – Business Link Vs Wikipedia In 2019

Sales Of Goods Act Comparison

This is a personal comparison study between Business Link and Wikipedia’s view on the Sales of Goods Act in the UK. This is just an educational comparison and no legal meaning is meant by this discussion.

From reading over the 2 Sales of Goods acts from the two sources, the first opinion on them both is that Business Link’s act is more positive for the end consumer, it is pointed more towards the options that consumers have when/if anything goes wrong with a sale. It includes additional information about Services that are provided apart from just a physical product. Whereas Wikipedia’s version is more purely process based with not much information regarding services. They put across that they do not believe the Goods Act is as good as they would like, saying: “a new sales of goods act is thought to be overdue”. If a consumer reads this act, it may make them feel that the Act is flawed if it is put across like this.

Sales Of Goods Act Educational Comparison - Business Link Vs Wikipedia In 2019

Carrying on with Wikipedia, who states there is “a minimal amount of minor restrictions” could mean that Consumers and Businesses are in need of a new detailed Act to cover more events that occur within the selling of goods. Wikipedia explains information more about the actual sales process, rather than the actual product. Including details about the ownership of the goods and possession, that the seller must hold the full ownership of a product to be able to sell it, this keeps the consumer free from events when a 3rd party who has security on the same product interferes with the sale or the consumer. This includes the ownership transfer occurring only when the goods have been delivered as advertised, not when any monies have been passed from the …

Read more

SEO In The Post Google Panda Age – Adapt Or PERISH

Search engine optimization (SEO) is not an exact science, and many of the so called gurus tend to make it sound a lot more complicated than it really is. A combination of on-page and off-page factors are responsible for the ranking of a website in the search engines. Google is the largest on the search engine companies and really does have the lions share of the market, claiming around 90% of the search traffic, with Yahoo and Bing as the second and third place companies, but only getting a small percentage of the searches.

There is little doubt that during 2011 the landscape has changed for search, and websites and article directories have been hot very hard by updates, in particular the Panda updates that Google have rolled out in the last few months. The issue seems to be one of thin content, content and sites that are only online purely for the monetization potential, and not offering a user experience that Google has chose to define. While this quality user experience may be tricky for us mere mortals to define, the SEO strategies do not need to change dramatically, but as SEO professionals, we need to implement additional measures to allow ourselves to remain competitive.

SEO In The Post Google Panda Age - Adapt Or PERISH

Good content, with keywords in title, description, title tags, and liberally sprinkled throughout the content are still relevant. Alt text for images is still a good idea. The use of latent semantic indexing (LSI) to them your content is still a good strategy. Internal link structures and good site navigation are essential to offering a good user experience.

Off page strategies like link building are important. Sure, we have all ranked pages with no links, but the inbound links certainly help to increase the perception of value of the page in the eyes of …

Read more